News

9/11 Remembrance Day: Flags Lowered After Powerful Tragic Shooting

Published

5 months ago

September 11, 2025

IS KAMBO

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

9/11 Remembrance Day – A Nation in Mourning: Flags at Half-Staff for Charlie Kirk Amid 9/11 Remembrance

(Orem, Utah) – In a somber confluence of events, the United States enters a period of national mourning, marked by flags flying at half-staff both for the tragic assassination of a prominent conservative figure and in solemn remembrance of the September 11th attacks.

President Donald Trump has ordered all U.S. flags to be flown at half-staff following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA. The incident occurred on September 10th during a question-and-answer session at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Kirk was 31.

The presidential proclamation, directed to all public buildings, military posts, naval stations, and embassies, mandates that flags remain lowered until sunset on September 14th. This period of mourning directly overlaps with the annual 9/11 Remembrance Day, a day when the nation already lowers its flags to honor the nearly 3,000 lives lost in the 2001 terrorist attacks.

In a post on Truth Social, President Trump confirmed Kirk’s death, calling the influential right-wing personality and close ally “Great, and even Legendary.” Later, in a pre-recorded message from the Oval Office, he stated, “He fought for liberty, democracy, justice and the American people. He’s a martyr for truth and freedom and there’s never been anyone who was so respected by youth.”

The investigation into the shooting remains active. Local authorities reported that two individuals were initially arrested but have since been released and are not believed to be the shooter. The search for the perpetrator continues.

This executive action to lower the flags for a private citizen, while rare, is within the president’s discretionary power. The U.S. Flag Code, maintained by the U.S. General Services Administration, serves as a guideline for the proper display of the flag. It specifically outlines periods of mourning for government officials, such as 30 days for a sitting or former president.

However, Section 7(m) of the code grants the president authority to issue proclamations to lower the flag for “the death of other officials, former officials, or foreign dignitaries.” As the code is advisory and lacks enforcement mechanisms, presidents have occasionally used this power to honor exceptional civilians, often those who have died in service to the nation or whose deaths represent a significant national tragedy.

The lowering of the flag this week creates a poignant, dual symbolism. Americans will look upon the lowered flag not only in memory of a recent, shocking act of violence but also in honor of one of the most defining days in modern American history: 9/11 Remembrance Day.

This day is observed with ceremonies at the National 9/11 Memorial & Museum and across the country, moments of silence marking the times the planes struck the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, and the crash of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania, and a collective national reflection on loss, resilience, and unity.

The tradition of flying the flag at half-staff is a powerful, non-verbal language of national grief. It has been employed after events that shake the nation’s core, from the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School to the passing of world leaders like Queen Elizabeth II. The sight of the flag resting below the peak of the flagpole is a universally recognized sign that the country is in a state of collective mourning, remembering those lost and honoring their memory.

As the nation navigates the grief from this new tragedy while reflecting on the profound loss from two decades past, the lowered flag stands as a silent, powerful testament to a nation’s enduring capacity to remember and to honor its fallen.

Up Next

9/11 for Kids – Heartbreaking: 5 Unforgettable Stories from Kids Born After 9/11

Don't Miss

Child Care Revolutionary: NM Saves Families $12K Annually!

News

Where’s My Refund? 3 Critical Shutdown Delays

Published

9 hours ago

February 3, 2026

IS KAMBO

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

2026 Tax Season in Chaos: Government Shutdown Puts Your Refund at Risk

Where’s My Refund? 2026 Government Shutdown Puts Tax Returns in Limbo

As millions of Americans ask “Where’s my refund?”, a looming government shutdown threatens to throw the 2026 tax season into disarray. With the IRS already processing returns, the ongoing political standoff in Washington could mean significant delays for your money.

We’re now on day three of a partial government shutdown, and the stakes for taxpayers are getting real. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), along with key departments like Homeland Security and Treasury, is operating without full funding. This means skeleton crews, potential closures, and a whole lot of uncertainty for folks counting on their refunds.

How Your Tax Refund Gets Hit

Let’s cut to the chase: if you’re waiting for money, this shutdown is bad news. The IRS has already warned that a shutdown could lead to reduced staff and major processing delays. While the agency will accept electronic returns, the behind-the-scenes work of reviewing and issuing refunds could slow to a crawl.

Refund Timelines at Risk: The earliest possible release of refunds is already pushed to February 15 for those claiming certain credits. A prolonged shutdown could extend that wait much longer.
Paper Returns Take a Back Seat: If you mail your taxes, expect even longer delays. Processing paper returns is labor-intensive and likely to be deprioritized.
Help Desks Go Quiet: Need to call the IRS with a question? Phone and in-person services are expected to face severe disruptions, leaving taxpayers in the dark.

The #1 Action to Take Right Now

In the face of this mess, experts have one clear piece of advice: File electronically and file early. This is your best defense against shutdown delays. E-filing gets your return directly into the system, so it’s in line for processing the moment full operations resume. The earlier you file, the better your chances of avoiding the backlog.

According to a recent Intuit Credit Karma survey, 54% of taxpayers plan to file early this year. They’ve got the right idea. Stay updated on the IRS status by checking the official IRS.gov website for alerts.

Why Did the Government Shut Down? A Homeland Security Standoff

So, why is this happening? The core of the shutdown battle is funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, are refusing to approve full-year funding without major policy changes.

This political crisis was triggered by the tragic killings of two American citizens, 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good and 37-year-old Alex Pretti, by federal agents in Minneapolis in January. In response, Democrats are demanding new “guardrails” and accountability measures for immigration officers, including an end to “roving patrols,” independent investigations, and mandatory body cameras.

As USA TODAY reported, these demands have created a stalemate. A key procedural vote on January 29 failed 55-45, highlighting the deep divide. Until a compromise is reached, the shutdown—and the tax refund headache—continues.

What’s Next? A Race Against the Clock

The House of Representatives returned to Washington on Monday, February 2, in an attempt to break the logjam. House Speaker Mike Johnson has expressed hope of passing a funding package for all agencies except DHS by Tuesday, February 3, allowing for two more weeks of negotiations.

However, Johnson has also warned, “We may inevitably be in a short shutdown situation.” This shutdown comes less than two months after the longest in U.S. history (43 days in late 2025), raising fears that this deadlock could also drag on.

For taxpayers, the message is clear: don’t wait. File your taxes now, manage your expectations for a delayed refund, and keep a close eye on Washington. Your financial planning may depend on it.

News

Tulsi Gabbard Aides Blast WSJ as ‘Utter Trash’ Amid Whistle blower Storm

Published

1 day ago

February 2, 2026

USA NEWS ALERTS

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Table of Contents:Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi Gabbard Aides Blast WSJ as ‘Utter Trash’ Amid Whistleblower Storm

Senior aides defend DNI Tulsi Gabbard, accuse Wall Street Journal of misleading reporting

A sharp public clash has erupted between aides to Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard and The Wall Street Journal, after the newspaper published a report centered on a highly classified whistleblower complaint alleging wrongdoing by the Trump Cabinet official.

Gabbard’s team has forcefully rejected the report, calling it misleading, politically motivated, and designed to create controversy where none exists.

What the WSJ Whistleblower Report Claims:Tulsi Gabbard

According to the Wall Street Journal, the whistleblower complaint involving Gabbard is so highly classified that it is reportedly locked in a secure safe, with access restricted due to national security concerns.

The Journal noted that:

The whistleblower’s attorney has not reviewed the complaint
Congress has not been given access, a situation described as having “no known precedent”
The intelligence community’s acting inspector general (IG) reviewed the allegations

The report further stated that while allegations directly tied to Gabbard were deemed not credible, the IG could not reach a determination on a separate allegation involving another federal agency.

Whistleblower Attorney Raises Concerns

The whistleblower’s attorney, Andrew Bakaj, reportedly sent a letter in November accusing Gabbard of preventing Congress from reviewing the complaint by not providing security clearance guidance.

Bakaj also told the Journal he was never informed that the inspector general had made credibility determinations regarding any part of the complaint.

These claims added fuel to the controversy and drew renewed attention to the handling of classified whistleblower materials within the intelligence community.

Gabbard’s Chief of Staff Fires Back

Gabbard’s chief of staff, Alexa Henning, publicly slammed the Wall Street Journal in a post on X (formerly Twitter), accusing the outlet of burying critical facts.

“As if the @WSJ needed to provide more examples of how it’s utter trash,” Henning wrote.

She emphasized that no wrongdoing was found and argued the paper downplayed that conclusion by placing it deep within the article.

“Even the Biden-era IC Inspector General concluded the whistleblower’s allegations against DNI Gabbard were not credible,” Henning added.

Spokesperson Calls Report ‘Disgusting Clickbait’

DNI spokesperson Olivia Coleman echoed the criticism, labeling the Journal’s reporting as the “most disgusting” clickbait she has encountered.

Coleman described the complaint as a politically motivated effort that relied on extreme classification to:

Create false intrigue
Manufacture a misleading narrative
Complicate lawful communication with Congress

She accused the whistleblower of weaponizing their position within the intelligence community to spark controversy rather than seek accountability.

Wall Street Journal Responds with Silence

As of publication, The Wall Street Journal has not issued a public response to the criticism from Gabbard’s aides. The Hill, which reported the backlash, confirmed the Journal did not immediately comment when contacted.

Why This Clash Matters

The dispute highlights ongoing tensions surrounding whistleblower protections, classified intelligence oversight, and media accountability in Washington. While the inspector general reportedly dismissed the core allegations against Gabbard, the secrecy surrounding the complaint continues to raise questions and fuel political debate.

For now, Gabbard’s office maintains that the matter is settled, while critics argue transparency remains incomplete.

If you want, I can also:

Add SEO keywords at the end
Create a table of contents
Optimize this further for Google News
Rewrite it in more neutral or more opinionated tone

Just tell me 👍

Gabbard Aides Slam WSJ as ‘Utter Trash’ but Whistleblower Questions Persist

Positive defense meets negative scrutiny as Tulsi Gabbard faces whistleblower spotlight

A heated political and media confrontation has emerged after aides to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard publicly attacked The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) over its reporting on a highly classified whistleblower complaint. While Gabbard’s team insists the allegations are baseless, the secrecy surrounding the complaint has fueled renewed debate and skepticism in Washington.

What the Wall Street Journal Reported

According to a report published by the Wall Street Journal
👉 https://www.wsj.com

the whistleblower complaint involving Gabbard is considered so highly classified that it is allegedly secured in a safe due to national security risks.

The report revealed several unusual details:

The whistleblower’s attorney has not reviewed the complaint
Congress has not been granted access
The situation was described as “without known precedent”

These disclosures added a negative sentiment, raising concerns about transparency, oversight, and accountability within the intelligence community.

Inspector General Finds No Credible Evidence Against Gabbard

In a positive development for Gabbard, the article acknowledged that the acting inspector general (IG) concluded allegations directly involving the DNI were not credible after reviewing her responses.

However, the IG reportedly could not make a determination regarding a separate allegation tied to another federal agency, leaving lingering uncertainty and political debate.

Whistleblower Attorney Challenges Handling of Complaint

Whistleblower attorney Andrew Bakaj claimed in a November letter—reviewed by the Journal—that Gabbard failed to provide security clearance guidance that would allow Congress to review the complaint.

Bakaj also stated he was never informed that the IG had reached any credibility determinations, adding to the negative narrative surrounding the case and how classified complaints are managed.

Gabbard’s Chief of Staff Launches Fierce Counterattack

Gabbard’s chief of staff, Alexa Henning, responded aggressively on X (formerly Twitter)
👉 https://x.com

calling the Wall Street Journal’s reporting “utter trash.”

Henning accused the publication of burying critical facts deep within the article and emphasized that no wrongdoing was found.

“Even the Biden-era IC Inspector General concluded the whistleblower’s allegations against DNI Gabbard were not credible,” she wrote.

This response reinforced a positive sentiment among Gabbard’s supporters, framing the report as misleading and politically driven.

DNI Spokesperson Labels Report ‘Disgusting Clickbait’

Adding to the backlash, Gabbard spokesperson Olivia Coleman condemned the article as the most “disgusting” piece of clickbait journalism she had seen.

Coleman argued the whistleblower weaponized their role by hiding allegations within highly classified materials to:

Create false intrigue
Push a manufactured narrative
Obstruct congressional review

Her remarks underscore a broader negative sentiment toward media credibility, while defending the administration’s handling of classified intelligence.

Wall Street Journal Remains Silent

As reported by The Hill
👉 https://thehill.com

the Wall Street Journal did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the sharp criticism from Gabbard’s aides, leaving the dispute unresolved in the public eye.

Bigger Picture: Transparency vs. National Security

This controversy highlights the ongoing struggle between national security secrecy and government transparency. While Gabbard’s office stresses that the allegations were dismissed, critics argue the lack of congressional access raises valid concerns.

The clash reflects both positive confidence in official findings and negative public doubt over how whistleblower complaints are handled at the highest levels of government.

Sports

Australian Open’s Epic 5-Set Victory Powers Djokovic to Historic Final

Published

2 days ago

February 1, 2026

IS KAMBO

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Table of Contents – Australian Open

Djokovic Defies Odds, Ends Sinner Streak to Chase 25th Grand Slam Crown

For American tennis fans, when the stakes are highest, Novak Djokovic still finds a way. In a monumental Australian Open semifinal that tested every ounce of his legendary resolve, the 38-year-old Serbian superstar overturned a haunting losing streak to defeat the formidable Jannik Sinner 3-6, 6-3, 4-6, 6-4, 6-4. This wasn’t just a win; it was a statement victory that propels him one step from a historic 25th Grand Slam title.

Entering the match, the odds seemed stacked against Djokovic. He had lost his last five meetings to the young Italian, including painful defeats in three consecutive major semifinals. Sinner, the two-time defending Australian Open champion, was in devastating form and hadn’t dropped a set all tournament. But on the iconic Rod Laver Arena, Djokovic authored a classic, battling for over four hours to snap that skid and advance to his 11th final in Melbourne.

“I wouldn’t dare to call it my finest ever, but definitely the finest in the last couple of years,” Djokovic said. “Under the circumstances… it doesn’t get better than this.”

The victory is a massive momentum shift for Djokovic, who endured a rare major-less season in 2024. Now, he stands on the brink of breaking the all-time record he shares with Margaret Court. A win in the final would secure his singular place in tennis history as the undisputed GOAT (Greatest of All Time) in terms of major singles titles.

The final hurdle? A blockbuster clash with the world’s current top player, Carlos Alcaraz. The Spanish phenom earned his spot earlier in the day with a grueling five-set win over Alexander Zverev, setting up a mouth-watering rematch of recent epic finals at Wimbledon and the Paris Olympics. This sets the stage for what many are calling a “dream final” for the Australian Open.

Djokovic’s path to this moment was physically taxing. The 38-year-old has been managing foot blisters and relied on his unparalleled mental fortitude and serve to weather Sinner’s storm. In a dramatic final set, he stared down eight break points, including a nerve-wracking 0-40 deficit at 4-3, before clawing his way to a legendary victory.

What This Means for Fans:

For viewers in the USA, Sunday’s final is an unmissable spectacle. It’s the ultimate generational clash: the relentless king, Djokovic, chasing immortality, against the explosive heir apparent, Alcaraz, eager to dethrone him on the biggest stage. It’s a narrative that transcends sports—a must-watch chapter in tennis history.