Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
Table of Contents
Columbia University officials are accusing federal agents of lying to gain entry to a campus building early Thursday morning, leading to the dramatic detention of a popular international student with a massive social media following.
Ellie Aghayeva
In a developing story that has ignited tensions between immigration enforcement and academic institutions, Ellie Aghayeva, a Columbia University senior attending on an international visa, was taken into custody by Department of Homeland Security agents in what university leadership is calling a “misrepresentation” of facts to gain access to the student.
The Pre-Dawn Raid
According to Columbia University’s acting president Claire Shipman, the incident unfolded around 6:30 a.m. Thursday when DHS agents arrived at a residential building on the New York City campus. Shipman alleges the agents gained entry by falsely claiming they were searching for a “missing person” – a tactic she strongly condemned in a letter to the campus community.
Ellie Aghayeva
“Federal agents misrepresented themselves to gain entry into our residential building,” Shipman wrote, emphasizing that law enforcement must present a judicial warrant or subpoena to access non-public university spaces, not merely an administrative warrant.
Who Is Ellie Aghayeva?
Identified by both The New York Times and Columbia’s student newspaper, the Columbia Spectator, the detained student is Ellie Aghayeva, a senior with significant digital influence. Aghayeva commands over 100,000 followers on both TikTok and Instagram, making her one of the more visible international students on campus.
Ellie Aghayeva
As news of her detention spread, Aghayeva posted on her Instagram story in the early morning hours: “DHS illegally arrested me. Please help.” The post has since circulated widely across social media platforms, drawing attention from fellow students, advocacy groups, and elected officials.
Legal Questions Mount
The circumstances surrounding Aghayeva’s detention raise serious legal questions about federal agents’ authority on university campuses. Shipman’s letter stressed that administrative warrants – which are typically issued by federal agencies themselves without judicial oversight – do not grant automatic access to university facilities.
Forbes has reached out to DHS for official comment on the allegations, but the agency has not yet responded to requests for clarification about the operation or the legal basis for the detention.
Political Leaders Respond
The incident has already drawn sharp criticism from New York City political leaders. New York City Council Speaker Julie Menin, joined by Council Majority Leader Shaun Abreu, both Columbia College alumni, issued a joint statement defending immigrant communities and criticizing federal enforcement tactics.
Ellie Aghayeva
“ICE has no place in our schools and universities. These activities do not make our city or country safer, but rather drive mistrust and danger,” Menin and Abreu said. “As Columbia College alumni, our hearts are with the community there, and we have been in contact with the University to offer our assistance.”
The statement reflects growing tensions between local governments and federal immigration authorities, particularly in sanctuary cities like New York that limit cooperation with immigration enforcement.
Campus Climate Concerns
The detention comes at a particularly sensitive time for Columbia University, which has been at the center of national debates about campus protests, free speech, and international student rights. International students make up a significant portion of Columbia’s student body, contributing both to the university’s academic excellence and its cultural diversity.
For many international students watching this case unfold, the incident raises concerns about their own vulnerability to federal enforcement actions. University officials have not indicated whether Aghayeva had any prior immigration issues or what specific allegations led to her detention.
What Happens Next
Legal experts suggest the case could become a flashpoint in ongoing debates about immigration enforcement on college campuses. The distinction between administrative warrants and judicial warrants – central to Columbia’s criticism of the operation – may become a key legal battleground.
Immigration advocates are likely to rally around Aghayeva’s case, given her social media prominence and the allegations of federal misrepresentation. Meanwhile, DHS may face pressure to explain both the basis for the detention and the tactics used to access the building.
For now, Aghayeva remains in federal custody, her Instagram post serving as a digital cry for help that has reached hundreds of thousands of followers and counting. The university has not indicated what legal support it may offer the detained student, though Shipman’s strong public statement suggests Columbia will not remain silent on the matter.
As this story continues to develop, it underscores the increasingly fraught relationship between federal immigration enforcement and American higher education – with a popular international student’s future hanging in the balance.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
Table of Contents
Supreme Court Hands Florida a Major Loss in Trucker License Fight Against California and Washington
WASHINGTON – In a decisive blow to Florida’s legal battle against two Western states, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday rejectedthe Sunshine State’s long-shot lawsuit that sought to block California and Washington from issuing commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) to truckers who don’t speak English or lack legal immigration status.
lawsuit
The high court’s order, issued without detailed explanation, marks the end of Florida’s aggressive attempt to use an original jurisdiction lawsuit—a rare legal move where states sue each other directly in the Supreme Court. Republican-led Florida had argued that the Democratic-led Western states were openly defying federal immigration laws by granting CDLs to non-citizens and non-permanent residents.
What Sparked the Legal Firestorm?
The case traces back to a deadly crash in Florida last year that claimed three lives. According to court records and news reports, the driver—identified as Harjinder Singh, a man from India—allegedly made an illegal U-turn, triggering the collision. Despite being in the U.S. without authorization, Singh held a valid commercial driver’s license from California and had previously been licensed by Washington state.
lawsuit
Florida officials seized on the tragedy to launch a legal offensive, arguing that Western states are essentially creating a “backdoor immigration policy” that endangers American roads. “States have no authority to license drivers who are unlawfully present in this country,” Florida’s legal team told the justices.
Why the Supreme Court Said No
The Supreme Court typically hears appeals from lower courts, but it has discretion to take up original lawsuits—disputes between states that begin and end at the nation’s highest bench. On Tuesday, a majority of the justices declined to hear Florida’s case, letting stand the existing practices in California and Washington.
lawsuit
Only Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, as they frequently do when the court rejects original jurisdiction cases. In a brief note, they argued that the court has no legitimate choice but to hear such state-versus-state disputes. However, their view did not sway the rest of the court.
A Separate Battle Over Trump-Era Rules
In a related development, a federal appeals court has already blocked a Trump administration proposal that would have imposed new, severe restrictions on which immigrants could obtain CDLs for semi-trucks or buses. That ruling remains in effect, meaning the legal tug-of-war over trucker licenses is far from over.
For now, states like California and Washington can continue issuing CDLs to qualified applicants—including those without legal status—so long as they meet safety and testing requirements. Advocates for immigrant truckers applauded the Supreme Court’s decision, while Florida’s governor called it “a frustrating roadblock to enforcing immigration laws.”
What This Means for American Drivers
If you share the road with big rigs, here’s why this matters: commercial driver’s licenses are critical for safety. They require written exams, road tests, and medical checks. Supporters of the Western states’ policies argue that licensing all drivers—regardless of immigration status—actually makes highways safer because it ensures everyone behind the wheel of a 40-ton truck has passed the same tests.
lawsuit
Florida’s rejected lawsuit claimed the opposite: that issuing CDLs to non-citizens encourages illegal immigration and increases crash risks. But the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the case suggests the justices are not ready to wade into this politically charged fight—at least not yet.
Bottom Line
The Supreme Court’s move is a major win for California and Washington and a stinging defeat for Florida. It also sends a signal that the high court is hesitant to rewrite immigration enforcement rules through state lawsuits. For truckers, immigrant communities, and anyone who drives near a semi, the battle over CDLs will continue in lower courts—and maybe, someday, back at the Supreme Court.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
Table of Contents – Air Force Monica Witt
U.S. Hunts Alleged Iranian Spy Monica Witt – FBI Drops $200,000 Bounty for Ex-Air Force Sergeant
The FBI is going all-in to catch a former U.S. Air Force sergeant who allegedly sold her country out to Iran – and they’re putting up a $200,000 reward to make it happen.
air force monica witt
Meet Monica Witt, 47, a onetime U.S. Air Force intelligence technical sergeant and later a defense contractor. In February 2019, a federal grand jury indicted her on serious espionage charges, including sharing classified national defense information with the Iranian government. But here’s the kicker: investigators believe she defected to Iran back in 2013 – and may still be actively helping the regime today.
air force monica witt
From Top-Secret Clearance to Alleged Betrayal
Witt served in the U.S. military from 1997 to 2008, then worked as a government contractor until 2010. During that time, she had access to top-secret intelligence – including the real identities of undercover U.S. intelligence personnel. That’s the kind of information that can get people killed.
“Monica Witt allegedly betrayed her oath to the Constitution more than a decade ago by defecting to Iran and providing the Iranian regime National Defense Information,” said Daniel Wierzbicki, special agent with the FBI Washington Field Office’s Counterintelligence and Cyber Division. “She likely continues to support their nefarious activities. The FBI has not forgotten.”
air force monica witt
She Put U.S. Families in the Crosshairs
According to the indictment filed in the District of Columbia, Witt didn’t just hand over secrets – she reportedly helped Iran target her former colleagues and their families stationed overseas.
“Witt allegedly intentionally provided information endangering U.S personnel and their families stationed abroad,” the FBI said in a public release. She also conducted research on behalf of the Iranian regime to help them single out her old teammates in the U.S. government.
air force monica witt
The FBI adds that her actions have directly benefited Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) – a designated terrorist organization responsible for intelligence gathering, unconventional warfare, and supporting attacks on Americans.
What Monica Witt Looks Like – And Her Aliases
If you’re scanning a crowd, here’s who to look for:
Race: White
Hair: Brown
Eyes: Brown
Height: 5 feet 10 inches
Weight: 120 pounds
She also goes by at least two aliases: Fatemah Zahra and Narges Witt.
Why This Matters to Every American
This isn’t just a dry intelligence story. Witt’s alleged betrayal puts real U.S. service members, intelligence officers, and their families at risk. When someone with her level of clearance turns against the country, they can expose codenames, operations, and cover identities – stuff that takes years and millions of dollars to rebuild. Worse, it can get people killed.
The FBI is treating this as a top priority. “During this critical moment in Iran’s history,” Agent Wierzbicki said, “there is someone who knows something about her whereabouts.”
air force monica witt
How You Can Help – And Claim the Reward
The FBI is asking anyone with information – no matter how small – to step up. You can remain anonymous, and if your tip leads to Witt’s capture and prosecution, you could walk away with $200,000.
Let’s cut to the chase. For folks looking to refinance, the 30-year fixed refinance rate climbed to 6.23% – that’s a noticeable hike. And it’s not just the 30-year. Nearly every loan type got more expensive overnight.
So, what’s going on? And more importantly, should you still pull the trigger on a refinance or wait it out? We’ll break it all down in plain English.
Today’s Mortgage Rates (For Home Buyers):Mortgage Refinance Rates
Before we dive into refinance numbers, here’s where purchase rates stand on Wednesday, May 13, 2026, according to Zillow data. Remember, these are national averages:
Loan Type
Interest Rate
30-year fixed
6.26%
20-year fixed
6.22%
15-year fixed
5.76%
5/1 ARM
6.47%
7/1 ARM
6.30%
30-year VA
5.65%
15-year VA
5.23%
5/1 VA
5.15%
The biggest movers? The 20-year fixed shot up 16 basis points and the 5/1 ARM jumped 17 basis points. If you’re house hunting, today’s rates sting a little more than yesterday’s.
Today’s Mortgage Refinance Rates (The Real Story):Mortgage Refinance Rates
Now for the main event – refinance rates. If you already own a home and were hoping to lower your monthly payment, today’s numbers aren’t pretty. Here’s the latest from Zillow for May 13, 2026:
Loan Type
Refinance Rate
30-year fixed
6.23%
20-year fixed
6.24%
15-year fixed
5.66%
5/1 ARM
6.12%
7/1 ARM
5.94%
30-year VA
5.60%
15-year VA
5.21%
5/1 VA
5.26%
A few things to notice:
Refinance rates are now higher than purchase rates for many loan types (though not all). That’s unusual – typically, refis cost a bit more, but the gap has widened.
The 20-year fixed refi rate (6.24%) is actually higher than the 30-year refi rate (6.23%). That’s a head-scratcher, but it happens when markets move fast.
VA loans still offer the lowest refi rates, with the 5/1 VA at just 5.15%. If you’re a veteran, that’s your best bet.
Pro tip: These are national averages. Your actual rate will depend on your credit score, home equity, location, and lender. Shop around!
Use This Mortgage Calculator Before You Do Anything:Mortgage Refinance Rates
Mortgage Refinance Rates
Don’t guess your monthly payment – crunch the numbers first. Bookmark the Yahoo Finance mortgage payment calculator to see how different rates and loan amounts affect your wallet.
The calculator lets you factor in:
Private mortgage insurance (PMI) if you put down less than 20%
Homeowners association (HOA) dues if applicable
Property taxes and home insurance
A 300,000loanat6.231,845**. At 5.66% (15-year fixed), that jumps to about **2,475∗∗permonth–butyou’llsaveover100,000 in total interest. Trade-offs, people.
30-Year vs. 15-Year Refinance: Which One Makes Sense Now?
Let’s talk real talk. With rates climbing, your decision between a 30-year and 15-year refinance matters more than ever.
30-Year Fixed Refinance – The Safe Bet
Pros: Lower monthly payments, predictable rate for three decades.
Cons: Higher interest rate (6.23% today) and you’ll pay way more interest over time.
Best for: Homeowners who need cash flow flexibility and plan to stay put for 5+ years.
15-Year Fixed Refinance – The Wealth Builder
Pros: Lower rate (5.66% today), pay off your home twice as fast, save tens of thousands in interest.
Cons: Monthly payments are significantly higher.
Best for: Homeowners with stable, high income who want to own their home free and clear by retirement.
Example: On a 250,000loan,the30−yearrefiat6.231,537/month. The 15-year at 5.66% costs ~2,062/month.Thatextra525/month saves you about $110,000 in total interest over the life of the loan. Not chump change.
Adjustable-Rate Mortgages (ARMs) – A Risky Gamble Right Now?
ARMs like the 5/1 and 7/1 are supposed to offer lower intro rates than fixed loans. But today? That’s flipped. According to Zillow, the 5/1 ARM refinance rate is 6.12% – higher than the 30-year fixed refi rate (6.23%? Wait, no – 6.23% fixed vs 6.12% ARM, actually ARM is slightly lower. Let me correct: 6.12% ARM is lower than 6.23% fixed. So ARMs still have a tiny edge.)
But here’s the catch: After the intro period (5 years for a 5/1 ARM), your rate can adjust annually. With rates trending up, you could get hammered later. Only consider an ARM if you’re 100% sure you’ll sell or refinance again before the adjustment period kicks in.
Frequently Asked Questions (Because We Know You’re Sweating)
What’s the 30-year refinance rate right now?
As of today, May 13, 2026, the national average 30-year refinance rate is 6.23% according to Zillow’s lender marketplace. But your local rate could be higher or lower – for example, mortgage rates vary by state, with high-cost cities often seeing higher rates.
Are mortgage rates dropping?
Not today. Rates are on the rise after a brief dip. Remember, at the end of March, the 30-year fixed touched nearly 6.50%. Then rates dropped almost half a point. But compared to yesterday? Everything’s up. The 20-year fixed jumped 16 basis points – that’s a big one-day move.
How do I get the lowest refinance rate?
Same playbook as when you bought your home:
Boost your credit score – even 20 points can shave 0.25% off your rate.
Lower your debt-to-income ratio (DTI) – pay down credit cards and avoid new loans.
Consider a shorter term – 15-year refi rates are lower than 30-year (5.66% vs 6.23%).
Shop at least three lenders – rates vary wildly.
One more thing: Refinance rates are often higher than purchase rates, but that’s not a law of nature. If you have strong equity (20%+) and excellent credit, you might snag a deal.
The Bottom Line for American Homeowners:Mortgage Refinance Rates
Mortgage Refinance Rates
Look, nobody likes seeing rates jump. Today’s 7-basis-point hike on 30-year refinance rates (that’s the “7” in our headline) is a gut punch if you were on the fence. But don’t panic. Rates are still far below the 7-8% range we saw in late 2023. If you can lock a 30-year refi at 6.23% and shave $200 off your monthly payment, that’s real money in your pocket.
The smart move: Run your numbers through the Yahoo Finance mortgage calculator. If your break-even point (closing costs divided by monthly savings) is under 24 months, go for it. If not, wait for the next dip – but don’t hold your breath. Rates are volatile.
Data source: Zillow lender marketplace, May 13, 2026. National averages rounded to nearest hundredth.